Being Feminine not Feminist

The idea of 'feminism' had travelled from Britain to the U.S.A. and by 1924 had been taken up by zealots at the University of Wisconsin who were already into polcorism ('political correctness'). Polcor is the notorious totalitarian ideology aiming to eventually suppress freedom of expression and stunt freedom of thought using conditioning techniques. (These experiments had started off at the Institute for Social Research  in Germany in 1923, the aim being to spread propaganda by language manipulation using Freudian brainwashing methods.)
           In the 1960s, the American feminista rebranded itself as 'women's liberation' with 'bra burning' as its trademark (although there is no evidence that 'bra burning' ever took place except as a publicity stunt in front of TV cameras). In more recent times it has dropped the 'women's lib' label but it remains what it has always been - a vicious and insidious men-hating ideology without moral authority, without intellectual legitimacy, and with characteristics like that of a cult.
           The zealots at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in the U.S. have long been associated with political extremism (like polcorism, feminism, and inventing the car bomb) and when the University's Chancellor, Donna Shalala, was appointed Secretary of Health & Human Services by former president Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary she used her office to promote these ideologies.
          The ultimate aim of feminism is to create a hateful society in which age-old ties among men, women and children are discarded. It is not about 'equality' for females at all, it is about 'superiority'. The feminista wants to call all the shots.

Feminism, the Hate Cult

Make no mistake about it. Feminism is about unabated hatred of men and boys and normal women. Some of the more forthright feminists even openly advocate the disfigurement or 'culling' of men.
          Feminism benefits from human error, misery, and chaos. It divides and destroys. It is anti-father, anti-male, anti-mother, anti-child, and anti-woman. Feminism is an insidious ideology manipulating itself through fronts like women's studies, women's issues, women's shelters, social services counselling.
          Feminism has always been a fraud. It is not at all about 'equality'. It is about getting preferential treatment for feminists. It deceptively manipulates its cult-like characteristics as a political force claiming to promote 'women's rights' whilst denying the rights of others. It operates in isolation and at the expense of society as a whole and at the expense of family life.
          This deception went undetected for many years. It is a deception that polarises the sexes, divides and attacks the family and children, all through the use of half-truths and false logic. It is a deception which has by now infiltrated most levels of government, church and social movements and which now proliferates itself through our educational systems. Even now we can see the signs of men being turned into an underclass in the eyes of the police and of the law.
          The involvement of an anti-men ideology deceptively disguised as 'women's issues' went undetected at first because it was based on the insidious half-truth - i.e. 'the truth that is a lie'.
          Feminism is founded on half-truths like victimisation and exploitation. The work of some women, like mothers confined to home and households to manage their families, is scorned by feminists because the feminista agenda gives no importance to the family. Also, the sacrifices made by some husbands and fathers are totally ignored. And in this world of half-truths the exploitation of men, women and children by the powers-that-be is ignored because it does not fit in with the feminist agenda.
 

The result of feminism has been a combination of disorder and state tyranny, cascading from America to the rest of the world. Feminism has meant growing deceit, heartlessness and brutality in daily life, resulting in particular suffering for the weak. It has meant confusion and misery for the young, who have been deprived of stable family life and concrete ideals of adulthood. It has meant the destruction of local and popular institutions and replaced them with ever more powerful and irresponsible state bureaucracies. It has set some women free but only to become sexual commodities. It is obvious that feminism is more about polarisation rather than about normality and harmony.
          The selective manipulation of victimisation, one of the half-truths, is a powerful tool in promoting their anti-male agenda. The course of the so-called 'women's movement' was led by individuals like Gloria Steinem, who had a questionable childhood surrounded by a negative family life and mental illness. This 'black and white thinking' is a common symptom of mental illness and it is a prominent characteristic of the feminist movement.
           The selective manipulation of women's victimisation ignored victimisation of men and children and ignored the victimisation of some women by other women. The psychosis of this manipulation is reflected in the polarisation of victimisation of an individual based on sex, to the false assumption that this affected all individuals of the same sex, normally women, and not any men. This is a clear logical error of philosophy that has intentionally been overlooked in the feminista's blinkered thinking.
            This selective manipulation of violence ignored all other forms of abuse. This is perhaps the most obvious and blatant manipulation by this movement, that ignores all the many forms of abuse, including passive manipulative abuse. Manipulation of 'male versus female' victimisation ignored all other form of victimisation, including social class discrimination.
          If there is anything we learn from all this it is that if we have problems, and we all do, then our best strategy is to take a positive approach to resolving them. It is tragic that in the era of the 'me' generation, problems are looked upon in isolation, in the self and in the now, when we should realise that these problems will affect our children and their grandchildren and their spouses whoever they might be. God only knows. People of suspect are those without children who have no link to the future, and or those with personality disorders.

Breaking the Shackles of Feminism

In the end feminism cannot win because it radically undermines any stable and productive ordering of private life. By disordering reproduction and child-rearing and the most basic human connections it puts long-term social survival in question. It has done a great deal of damage and is bound to do much more before it destroys itself.
           In the past few years there has been a movement of growing resistance to selfish feminism. One of the groups at the forefront of this liberation movement has been Fathers4Justice.
           Fathers4Justice was founded in Britain as a fathers' rights organisation championing the cause of equal parenting, family law reform and equal contact for divorced parents with children. From there it spread to the U.S. and elsewhere in the world. (It is interesting to note that the meetings in the U.S. were being spied on by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.) Fathers4Justice is now realising positive results right across the world.
           This is a good time to question the people of America about the massive mistreatment and destruction of their children. After all, the continuing, deliberate risking of children's health and life, in the name of personal enrichment of their parents, has already led to public policies that not only overlook dangers to children, but condone and encourage parental practices that are well known to be risky, all in the name of a feministic rationalisation of adult 'needs'.

America's Babies

America's feminists, and by extension the American people and their institutions, have attacked babies and children in the name of feminism and other self-interest. The maniacal and persistent propaganda of victimisation promulgated by America's feminists has been used to justify the atrocities committed on innocent children and men.
           An example of political exploitation of some women's sense of 'victimisation' was cited by Kathleen Parker who writes for the Orlando Sentinel. In an article entitled 'Imagine a world without men' she discussed the National Organisation for Women's resistance to the bill intended to restore the rights of fathers. The article ended with the writer pointing out that the National Organisation for Women's very existence depended on its projection of women as 'victims'. Strengthening families and re-instating fatherhood threatens its status and the other organisations that thrive on this 'we are victims' culture.
          In the case of America's children, it is hard to find anyone willing to even acknowledge children's needs for parents and there is fierce resistance to even accepting the reality of the actual dangers, which are frequently shown in the media. Many children die in daycare centres, not to mention the thousands of abandoned children, including infants thrown into skips and left in toilets by their own mothers.
           America's savage treatment of innocent children has other dimensions as well. There is plenty of denial, covering up and papering-over the deaths, the neurological damage, the learning disabilities, including the huge recent increase in cases of autism in the U.S. and the psychological traumas. There is active, intentional rationalisation such as the frequent surfacing of misleading 'studies' that show how supposedly unaffected by parental neglect children who grow up in daycare are.
           U.S. public policy favours adult pursuits over children's wellbeing. And, of course, there is the legal framework (which currently puts the U.S. in the company of a handful of third world countries which execute juvenile delinquents).
          And, finally, besides Somalia (which has not had an effective government in decades) the U.S. is the only country in the world that has refused to ratify the Universal Convention on the Rights of Children, the most widely accepted human rights treaty in the world. But then, why would a money-mad, sex-worshipping, self-absorbed and anti-social population want rights for small children? They don't vote, don't have spending power and are not big enough for sex.
 

The fact of the matter is that, almost without exception, Americans pretend that the problems are not there or they minimise their catastrophic scale or find all sorts of excuses. The result is massive ignorance, collective dereliction of civic duty and destruction of young lives on a genocidal scale.
          When Senator Hillary Clinton tells single mothers that it is the government's job to keep them working she does nothing short of selling out the babies that these trashy American mothers abandoned for selfish reasons and Hillary only does it for the sake of votes. Children are too little to vote, but if they could, perhaps Hillary would offer them candy or drugs.
          The additional presumption of the credibility of non-working mothers vs. non-working fathers is what, in this case, put the last nail in the coffin of America's fatherhood. 
          Most definitively the U.S. is a baby-killing society and we call upon the billions of people outside of America to not allow these crimes of the millenium to go unnoticed.